View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001533 | Xdebug | Feature/Change request | public | 2018-03-07 19:47 | 2019-01-23 20:39 |
| Reporter | dwilks | Assigned To | derick | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | acknowledged | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 2.6.0 | ||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||
| Summary | 0001533: Add ability to override xdebug.remote_timeout per request | ||||
| Description | We'd like to use xdebug.remote_autostart=1 and xdebug.remote_connect_back=1 to simplify life for our developers. Unfortunately sometimes our overseas developers with high latency need to debug against US servers which would require a high xdebug.remote_timeout setting. This, unfortunately, would negatively impact non-debugging users like QA and PM. What would be greats is the ability to override for xdebug.remote_timeout per request using something like the xdebug cookie in the request payload. Then the only time the cookie would be necessary is for those few times when we specifically need to support high latency. - Debugging locally wouldn't need a cookie anymore - Non-debugging requests wouldn't be severely impacted - Remote debuggers could override the timeout with their cookie Thanks for your consideration | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Operating System | |||||
| PHP Version | 7.2.0-7.2.4 | ||||
|
|
I can change this, but I am wondering why you think it would negatively impact non-debugger users to have a high latency. A well configured TCP/IP stack should normally instantly return if there is no bound socket to listen. Are you actively seeing this problem with high latency configured? |
|
|
Yes. Our (US) remote teams (India/Romania) have been forced to continue to use the debug proxy configuration due to the latency of the network. We can't set remote_timeout too much higher or remote QA (which will never have debuggers) end up complaining about performance. |
|
|
OK. I need to have a good think about this, because I think it would be wise if there would be a way to specify a maximum timeout in order to prevent resource starvation (we don't want people on the internet to be able to set a timeout of 900000000 ms for example). |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-07 19:47 | dwilks | New Issue | |
| 2018-10-19 00:45 | derick | Note Added: 0004704 | |
| 2018-10-19 00:45 | derick | Assigned To | => derick |
| 2018-10-19 00:45 | derick | Status | new => feedback |
| 2018-10-19 01:50 | dwilks | Note Added: 0004707 | |
| 2018-10-19 01:50 | dwilks | Status | feedback => assigned |
| 2019-01-23 20:39 | derick | Note Added: 0004848 | |
| 2019-01-23 20:39 | derick | Status | assigned => acknowledged |
